A November nyc State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, New York voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that will allow several new casino resorts to be built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is effective, that referendum shall be halted due to language in the ballot question that he claims violates state legislation.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum includes a number of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposal in an unmistakably positive light. For instance, the question mentions ‘promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting local governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was approved by the State Board of Elections in July.
But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. Based on case filed in the ny State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on making use of public profit the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use public money to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has had up issues with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and spiritual groups have also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider s…